How it typically works?
- Configuration: developers embed a known certificate or public key inside the application.
- Connection: when the client initiates a TLS session with a server, it receives the server’s certificate.
- Validation: the client compares the certificate or key against the pinned value.
- Decision: if there is a match, the connection proceeds. If not, the connection is blocked.
This mechanism ensures that only the expected certificate is ever trusted, even if other certificate authorities attempt to validate a fraudulent one.
Common techniques
- Static pinning: the application is shipped with a hardcoded certificate or public key. Simple but requires updates when certificates are rotated.
- Dynamic pinning: the application downloads and caches the expected certificate during the first trusted connection. More flexible but can be abused if the initial connection is intercepted.
- Public key pinning: instead of pinning an entire certificate, only the public key is pinned, making certificate renewal easier without breaking connections.
- Mobile app pinning: frequently used in mobile banking and payment apps to prevent attackers from intercepting HTTPS traffic with debugging proxies.
- SSL pinning bypass: attackers sometimes attempt to disable or patch pinning logic during reverse engineering of applications. Obfuscation and runtime checks are used to counter this.
Impact
Certificate pinning significantly raises the bar for attackers attempting HTTPS interception. Even if a trusted certificate authority is compromised or misused, the client will only trust the pinned certificate or key. This makes it a powerful defense against man-in-the-middle attacks in sensitive environments such as mobile banking, healthcare, or government applications.
However, pinning also introduces operational challenges. Certificates expire regularly, and if an application is pinned to a certificate that changes, users may be locked out until the application is updated. For this reason, many organizations prefer pinning public keys rather than full certificates. SecOps teams must balance the added security with the potential risk of service disruption.
Pinning is not a universal replacement for proper certificate validation but rather a complementary defense. When implemented correctly, it ensures that even if the trust ecosystem is attacked, communications remain protected.